Primary Theme: Extraterrestrial Races
Additional Themes: Human History & Ancient Civilisations · Metaphysics/Spirituality
Sources: 7 transcripts, 4 speakers (Swaruu 9, Yazhi Swaruu, Aneeka of Temmer, Athena Swaruu)
Transcripts: 104, 169, 234, 340, 400, 409, 138
Short Answer
Partly yes, but the material describes it as more layered than a simple "angels were astronauts" explanation. There are at least three distinct threads that the biblical concept of "fallen angels" collapses into a single image — and disentangling them reveals that no single extraterrestrial race or event corresponds to the story.
The first and most literal layer is exactly what the question suggests: beings who came down from the sky in craft. Athena Swaruu confirms this directly — "fallen from heaven" because "they came down in ships" (409). In this reading, any extraterrestrial race that visited Earth and was observed by pre-technological humans would qualify as "angels" who descended, and "fallen" simply means they came down physically.
The second layer is theological — beings expelled from God's grace for having angered him. Athena traces this to the Flavian dynasty's construction of biblical narratives, built upon older religious concepts of angering the gods, and used as a mechanism of mass control through fear (409). This is not a description of actual events but a deliberately crafted story using real observations of extraterrestrial visitors as raw material.
The third layer involves specific races whose characteristics map onto the angel mythology. The Elohi (a Pleiadian race from Asterope) are directly connected to the biblical Elohim — Swaruu describes them as "taken as fallen angels and demons" in the Middle East, where the concept of Jinn originates (104). The Karistus of Jupiter deliberately appear with wings and are described as partially the origin of the Earth angel concept (234). And the Taygetan term "Hashmallim" — meaning something like special forces — filtered into Hebrew and appears in the Bible as "legions of archangels" (400).
The material's answer is therefore: yes, "fallen angels" are extraterrestrials, but the concept is a composite — it blends literal observations of beings descending in ships, theological inventions designed for population control, and the cultural traces of multiple specific races whose characteristics were folded into a single biblical category that never corresponded to one actual group.
"Anunnaki" and "Fallen Angels" as the Same Misidentification
The term "Anunnaki" and the concept of "fallen angels" overlap almost completely in the material, and both are described as suffering from the same fundamental problem: they are treated as referring to a single race when they actually describe multiple races conflated by human observers who lacked the framework to distinguish them.
Yazhi states directly: "Anunnaki is not a race identified by us or by the Federation. Anunnaki is used to describe almost any Reptilian race that is negatively managing Earth — Kingu, Draco, Usungal, Naga, etc." But then she immediately expands beyond this: "Anunnaki were many races, not one. It is a very big and damaging mistake to think of Anunnaki as one race, even more to think of Anunnaki as only Reptilians" (340).
The Reptilian association, Yazhi explains, came primarily from Zechariah Sitchin, described as "a Jesuit working for the Vatican to deform and misinform Sumerian historical information. He didn't even know how to read Cuneiform" (340). Before Sitchin's influence, the term referred broadly to all races that visited and guided (or manipulated) Earth, including positive ones.
Athena provides the Taygetan definition: "all those who came down from 'heaven' to Earth and sowed knowledge. They sowed, that's why they are represented with a bag that the 'Anunnaki' carry, not only in the statues in Sumer but also in other places like Mesoamerica and the Far East and also in some Moai on Easter Island" (340). By this definition, the Taygetans themselves are Anunnaki — "strictly speaking, and it is the reality by definition and by heritage and history, Taygetans (and we Swaruus) are all 'Anunnakis', removing the Reptilian connotation associated to that erroneously."
The "fallen angels" concept operates the same way. It collapses an enormous diversity of extraterrestrial visitors — positive, negative, Lyrian, Reptilian, and everything else — into a single theological category that was then further distorted to serve the interests of population control through religion.
The Specific Races Behind the Angel Concept
The Elohi / Elohim
The most direct connection the material draws between a specific race and the "angels" of scripture is the Elohi. Swaruu identifies them as one of the 11 interstellar Pleiadian races, from the star Asterope, listed under the names "Eloh / Elohi / Naph / Elois" (104).
When Gosia asks directly whether the Elohi of the Pleiades are the same as the Elohim of the Bible, Swaruu confirms the connection but describes it as complicated: "they are a race of air, 'Elios', as spirit, like from Gins. Taken as deities by some and as invasive and malevolent spirits by others. At the end, they are only more people and it is true that much of them had to do with humanity in antiquity. They are taken as fallen angels and demons. Especially known in the Middle East where the concept of Gin or Genie comes from" (104).
This is a significant detail. The same race — the Elohi — is behind both the "angel" concept and the "demon/jinn" concept in Middle Eastern tradition. The difference between angel and demon, in this account, is not a difference in the beings themselves but in how different human cultures and different historical periods interpreted contact with the same species. This maps onto the broader pattern the material describes where a single extraterrestrial race gets encoded as multiple contradictory mythological figures depending on the observer's cultural framework.
The Karistus
The Karistus of Jupiter represent a different thread of the angel mythology. Yazhi describes them as 6D beings (though she later qualified this, saying density labels are "New Age") who "appear with wings because they like to be seen as angels. The concept of angel on Earth partially comes from them" (234).
Unlike the Elohi connection, which is linguistic and historical, the Karistus connection is deliberate — they choose to appear with wings. They are described as among the most active races fighting in favour of humankind, engaging in direct combat against regressive agents (234). Together with the Alfratans, they are described as "the most numerous non-human species working here in favor of Earth."
The Karistus mythology includes a claim that all Lyrian races are Karistus hybrids — that humanity, along with all human-type interstellar races, originated from the Karistus. From their perspective, the Earth is a Karistus world invaded by the Vlash (their term for all negative races), and the current situation is a war between Karistus-aligned souls and Vlash-aligned ones (234). Whether or not other races accept this claim (the Taygetans do not accept the ownership assertion), the Karistus self-concept as guardians who appear with wings provides a direct and intentional link to the angel mythology.
The Hashmallim
A third specific connection comes through the Taygetan military term "Hashmallim." Aneeka explains that this is not a borrowed Earth word but originated with the Taygetans and filtered to Earth through their presence in ancient Egypt: "that one is from here filtered there. It is even found in the Bible as legions of archangels. Something like Special Forces" (400).
The linguistic chain — from Taygetan military terminology to ancient Egyptian languages to Hebrew to the Bible — illustrates how a specific interstellar military concept became encoded as a theological one. "Legions of archangels" in biblical text originally described something closer to Taygetan special operations units. The "arch" (chief) "angels" (messengers from heaven) were, in this reading, elite military personnel from an interstellar civilisation whose presence in Egypt left permanent traces in the languages that would eventually produce biblical scripture.
Athena extends this linguistic analysis: "The ending 'el' refers to gods or names of gods. This ending is used in many star cultures, but it is true that in the Pleiades is where it is most used. From there come the words ELevation, Elevated, ELevator, ELohim, and so on" (409).
The Enki/Enlil Problem
The material addresses the related question of whether Enki and Enlil — the Sumerian figures often identified as specific "fallen angels" or "Anunnaki" — were real individuals. Swaruu's position is unambiguous: they were peoples, not individuals.
"From our information, Enki and Enlil were peoples and not individuals... There are no records of any Enlil or any Enki outside the terrestrial saga" (169). The Sumerian Tablets, like the Old Testament, are described as written in a double-code system where names refer to groups rather than characters. The Federation and Taygetan computer records contain no entries for individuals named Enki or Enlil, while they do contain records for Shiva, Anu, Ishtar, and Osiris among others.
The claim that Enki or Enlil caused the Great Flood is rejected as theology rather than history: "it does not explain how they did it, making it fall into more theology and misinterpreted myths of gods. We are telling you how the flood happened and it is because of something natural, explainable and predictable, a cosmic event" (169). The flood was caused by the destruction of Tiamat approximately 12,500 years ago — a physical event, not an act of divine will by individual beings.
Swaruu is emphatic about the mechanism of human limitation: "I do not believe in Enki / Enlil, gods with powers, nor do I believe in test tube genetic manipulation when here I have the answers to how the human limitation has been achieved. Mind control + Matrix frequencies!" (169). This challenges a major pillar of the popular "fallen angels" narrative — the idea that specific god-beings genetically engineered humanity. In the Taygetan account, the limitation of humanity was achieved primarily through consciousness manipulation, not laboratory genetics.
The Theological Layer: Manufactured Fear
Athena's second interpretation of "fallen angels" — beings expelled from God's grace — is traced to deliberate theological construction. The concept of "angering God" is described as a fear-based control mechanism, built by the Flavian dynasty (who constructed the biblical narratives) upon older religious concepts. The Flavian dynasty — Emperor Titus as Jesus, Vespasian as God the Father — ordered the collection and editing of stories that became the Bible, deliberately structuring them to provoke fear and obedience (409).
The "fallen" in "fallen angels" therefore has a dual function: literally, it describes beings who descended from the sky. Theologically, it describes beings who were cast out of divine favour — a concept that the material traces to human political engineering rather than actual cosmic events. The theological layer was built on top of the observational layer, using real memories of extraterrestrial visitors as raw material for a control narrative.
This parallels the broader pattern described across the material where every major religion is described as having been created for population control, tailored to fit the cultural context and former beliefs of its target population. The "fallen angel" concept is one node in this network — a real phenomenon (extraterrestrial visitors) repackaged as a theological narrative (divine punishment) to serve institutional power.
The Multiple Codes Problem
The deeper issue the material raises is that ancient texts about "angels" operate on multiple simultaneous levels of meaning. Athena describes the Sumerian Tablets and associated documents as written in codes and parables "that contain many levels of information according to the context, and they can be read in several different ways, not even two, according to the level of consciousness and wisdom and knowledge of the initiate" (340).
This means the question "are fallen angels just ETs" is itself too simple. The texts that describe fallen angels were designed to function at multiple levels simultaneously — as literal history for the uninitiated, as encoded information for intermediate students, and as something else entirely for those with the deepest understanding. The extraterrestrial-visitors reading is more accurate than the theological reading, but it is still only one level of what these texts contain.
Evolution Across Speakers
Swaruu of Erra (2018–2020) provides the historical and linguistic framework: the Elohi as the race behind the Elohim concept, the "fallen angels and demons" connection to Middle Eastern Jinn mythology, the Hashmallim as Taygetan military terminology found in the Bible, Enki and Enlil as peoples not individuals, mind control as the true mechanism of human limitation rather than genetic manipulation by "gods."
Yazhi Swaruu (2021–2022) adds the macro-level correction: Anunnaki as a catch-all term for multiple races (not one), Sitchin's work as Vatican-directed misinformation, the Karistus as beings who deliberately appear with wings and are partially behind the angel concept, all Lyrian races as "Anunnaki" by the correct historical definition.
Athena Swaruu (2023–2024) provides the clearest direct answer: two interpretations of "fallen angels" (literal descent in ships, and theological expulsion from grace), the second traced to Flavian dynasty construction, the "el" suffix as Pleiadian in origin, and the observation that the gods of Olympus reflect humans observing the personal lives of visiting stellar beings.
Key Transcript References
- 104 — Elohi/Elohim connection: Elohi as Pleiadian race from Asterope (one of 11 interstellar Pleiadian races), "taken as fallen angels and demons," concept of Jinn/Genie originates from contact with Elohi, "race of air, 'Elios', as spirit" — also positive Sauroids mentioned as part of Pleiadian grouping
- 169 — Enki and Enlil as peoples not individuals: no Federation/Taygetan records of individual Enki or Enlil, Sumerian Tablets written in same double-code system as Old Testament, flood caused by cosmic event (Tiamat destruction) not divine will, "I do not believe in Enki/Enlil gods with powers nor in test tube genetic manipulation — mind control + Matrix frequencies"
- 234 — Karistus as angel origin: 6D beings who "appear with wings because they like to be seen as angels — concept of angel on Earth partially comes from them," Karistus claim all Lyrian races are their hybrids, Vlash vs Karistus as fundamental duality, among most active races fighting for humankind alongside Alfratans, not Federation members, direct combat engagement against regressive agents
- 340 — Anunnaki clarification: not a single race (not identified as race by Federation), "very big and damaging mistake to think of as one race," Sitchin as Jesuit agent for Vatican misinformation, Taygetan definition = "all those who came down from heaven and sowed knowledge" (bag-carrying figures), "Taygetans are all Anunnakis," Sumerian Tablets contain multiple levels of coded information
- 400 — Hashmallim: Taygetan military term (Special Forces equivalent) filtered to Earth through Egypt, "found in Bible as legions of archangels," Hebrew derived from ancient Egyptian-based languages, Taygetans were in Egypt, maritime law/Bible connection ("waters above" = space)
- 409 — Fallen angels direct answer: two interpretations (1. came down in ships therefore "fallen from heaven," 2. expelled from God's grace — biblical/theological), case two traced to Flavian dynasty construction upon older concepts, fear-based mass control, "el" suffix = gods/Pleiadian origin (ELevation, ELevator, ELohim), gods of Olympus as humans observing stellar visitors' personal lives
- 138 — Historical context: Great Expansion ~1 million years ago scattered 400,000 human-like races, Federation born from survival need, Earth colonised ~40,000 years ago by Lyrians, Taygetan colony in Lemuria, Reptilian invasion leading to "First Ancient War" with nuclear weapons — the historical backdrop against which "fallen angels" narratives were later constructed