The Taygetan perspective on Sumer challenges both mainstream archaeology and many popular alternative theories, including those derived from Zecharia Sitchin's interpretations of the Sumerian tablets. According to Swaruu of Erra, Sumer was not primarily reptilian, nor was it an independent civilisation separate from Egyptian influence — and the famous Sumerian tablets are fundamentally disinformation.
Egypt Predates Sumer
Swaruu of Erra is unambiguous: the Egyptian culture predates Sumer. The roots of Egyptian civilisation go back to Ireland, and the concepts that appear in Sumerian culture — including Enki, Enlil, and the Elohim — originated as Egyptian concepts, not Sumerian ones. The conventional archaeological view that places Sumer and Egypt as roughly contemporary or gives Sumer temporal priority is incorrect, part of what Swaruu describes as the Matrix historians' refusal to incorporate documented evidence about the true origins of these civilisations (169, Swaruu of Erra).
The Elohim Were Federation Races
The beings portrayed as gods in Sumerian iconography — the bearded figures, the winged beings, the figures standing on lions — were the same Federation races that operated in Egypt. Swaruu identifies them collectively under the label Elohim, which on Earth encompasses Elohi (from Asterope), Taygetans, Engans, Solatians, and even some positive reptilian races. All of these were categorised as Elohim by the human populations who encountered them throughout the Middle East before the time of Vespasian and Titus (169, Swaruu of Erra).
The "bearded ones" of Sumeria were Elohim, and they were not giants — they were depicted as large because they were "big" in terms of their attributes and importance, not their physical size. This is symbolism taken literally by later interpreters (169, Swaruu of Erra).
The Egyptian and Sumerian civilisations were connected through the same stellar influences. As Swaruu demonstrates through the symbology analysis, figures standing on two lions appear in both Egyptian and Sumerian art because they represent the same non-human races. The civilisations were parts of the same broader Federation presence on Earth, not independent developments (146, Swaruu of Erra).
Enki and Enlil: Peoples, Not Individuals
One of the most significant Taygetan claims about Sumer is that the names Enki and Enlil do not refer to individual beings but to peoples. This is the same double-code system used in the Old Testament, where names can be read either as individuals or as groups, with the educated elite understanding one meaning and the general population understanding another (169, Swaruu of Erra).
Swaruu decodes the conflict as follows: Enki represents the People of Israel — the followers of Akhenaten — while Enlil represents the People of Egypt who opposed Akhenaten's reforms. Both were "brothers" and "sons" of Egypt, and this predates the Sumerian Tablets. The famous war between Enki and Enlil as recorded in the tablets was the conflict between Akhenaten-Nefertiti and Meritaten-Ramses II (169, Swaruu of Erra).
The Sumerian Tablets Are Disinformation
Swaruu's most challenging claim is that the Sumerian Tablets were created for the same purpose as the Old Testament: disinformation and mind control. She states that the tablets were written by the same group of people who later compiled the Old Testament and are structured in a very similar way — a set of stories from various parts of the world, condensed and coded to serve an agenda. Someone without knowledge reads them one way; the educated elite reads them another way (169, Swaruu of Erra).
She emphasises that just because something is old does not mean it is true. The tablets are treated by many alternative researchers as absolute truths, but hundreds of historians and exo-archaeologists from Taygeta and the broader Federation conclude they were created as a control document. The claim that the tablets are approximately five thousand years old is also disputed — Swaruu suggests they are more recent than claimed (169, Swaruu of Erra).
Were There Wars Between Sumer and Egypt?
The conflict was not between Sumer and Egypt as separate civilisations but between factions within what was fundamentally a single Federation-influenced cultural zone. The Enki-Enlil conflict represents the internal Egyptian power struggle between Akhenaten's monotheistic faction and the traditional polytheistic establishment. This conflict played out across the region but was not a war between independent civilisations — it was a civil war within the broader Federation-guided structure, with the Sumerian tablets recording a coded version of these Egyptian events (169, Swaruu of Erra).
The reptilian presence in the region was real — Atlantis was described as "almost exclusively reptilian" (138, Swaruu of Erra), and the Reptilian Confederation was in ongoing conflict with the Federation throughout this period. However, Sumer itself was not primarily a reptilian civilisation. It was part of the Federation sphere, influenced by the same mix of races that operated in Egypt, with the reptilian conflict happening at a broader civilisational level rather than being specific to Sumerian culture.
Sources: Transcripts 169 (Swaruu of Erra), 146 (Swaruu of Erra), 138 (Swaruu of Erra)